Thursday, March 15, 2012

Blog One

In this post, I will be discussing the introduction in Daniel Imhoff's The CAFO Reader.

The introduction of Daniel Imhoff’s The Cafo Reader examines the ethical, social, and environmental repercussions of the CAFO(Concentrated Animal Feeding Organization) system. It gives us behind-the-scenes details on how most of our animal food source is raised, and exploited, in the United States.

The prominent debate here is one that has profound ethical inconsistencies: How do these CAFOs operate? And, what ethical issues arise from such massive animal food supply systems? Some argue that the animals involved are not to be counted as individuals, rather to be accounted for as an aid to the survival of humans. These “species-ist”, Imhoff states, rank humans to be first amongst all other living things, and encourage the flourishing of humanity as an ultimate priority, argue that animals do not feel and that they are “soulless automata”, as depicted by RenĂ© Descartes (Pg. 4). The objection to this, according to Imhoff, is clear as to why these CAFOs are unethical, not only forcing these animals to unnatural and synthetic environments, but to why they are unstable and subject for moral questioning.

Imhoff proceeds to unify moral ideals that state that no human should be enslaved, as well as those of inequality protecting people of all sex, gender, and race, with those of animal rights with a quote by Jeremy Bentham stating that “the day may come when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights.” (Pg. 5). In addition, we are confronted with religious opposition. With the like of the Ancient Hindus who praised and worshipped cows for their sustenance, as well as Kosher ethical practices that protected animals, enforcing that the creature be tended to, and slaughtered humanely.

Ultimately, the road to ethics is never an easy one, and the path to ethical food production is no exception. I agree with Imhoff, that in the future, historians will look back scornfully, almost regrettably, to these inhumane practices. That in the end we are, indeed, as Imhoff implies, part of a system that has universal moral values in which all creation is protected equally and “certainly they deserve our care, respect, and mercy” (Pg. 5).


-H. G.